|
University of Minnesota
Mayo Building - Compressed Air Plumbing |
|
Project Overview |
Consists of removing old air compressors and related equipment and controls. The majority of removed equipment is on the 7th and 9th floors of the Mayo Building. The contractor will install new piping from a new air compressor system in Moos Tower to the 9th floor of Mayo Building. Both buildings are connected, deep underground, by a utility tunnel. Based on preliminary plans, there are plumbing connections to be made in the deep tunnel, and in the pipe chase on 7th and 9th floors. All power and utility connections, to old compressors and old equipment, are to be removed entirely to source.
|
| Schedule |
No |
|
End Date |
|
Task |
1 |
|
10/18/06 |
|
Educational Meeting & Site Walk
|
2 |
|
10/23/06 |
|
Submittals Due (Proposal, RA Plan, EEO) |
3 |
|
10/26/06 |
|
UMN Identifies Best Value |
4 |
|
10/26/06 |
|
Pre Award Kick Off Meeting
|
5 |
|
10/30/06 |
|
Pre Award Meeting |
7 |
|
11/01/06 |
|
Anticipated Date of Award |
|
| Bidding / Proposal Information |
All information is removed once bids are submitted. To obtain this information, please contact the client or the PBSRG. |
|
Award Information |
Vendor Name : |
|
MMC |
Estimated Budget: |
|
$52,000 |
Awarded Cost: |
|
$46,525 |
Awarded Schedule: |
|
55 days |
Scope of Work: |
|
Remove old air compressors and related equipment |
For detailed award information, click here ( XLS). (This excel spreadsheet provides a summary of all the data that was collected. It is available only to pre-approved vendors). Please contact the PBSRG for the username and password.)
For a complete list of all project risks, click here ( DOC). (This document contains a list of all the risks that were identified by the vendors on this project. No solutions are identified, just a list of risks). This file is available to only pre-approved vendors. Please contact the PBSRG for the username and password.
|
|
Closeout Status |
Vendor met proposed schedule: |
|
Yes |
Vendor met proposed cost: |
|
Yes |
Vendor met purposed quality/customer satisfaction: |
|
Yes |
Final customer rating of PIPS (10 max): |
|
10 |
| Final rating of contractor (10 max): |
|
9.75 |
|
|
Print this page
