
|
university of minnesota
Eastcliff Boiler Replacement |
|
Project Overview |
1) Main House Boiler Replacement: Demo existing boilers, domestic water and piping and provide new high efficiency hot water boilers and new domestic water system with holding tanks and set them in place, provide connections and valves and replacement of four, 4-pipe fan coil units (located in private kitchen, foyer, dining room, and walnut den).
2) Main House Kitchen AHU Replacement: Remove and replace main kitchen air handling unit (AHU) with chilled water and hot coil unit with electric reheat. Remove existing air conditioning unit from main kitchen closet and condensing unit from east lawn adjacent Main Kitchen.
3) Carriage House: Install new boiler for Carriage House on lower level and connect to new domestic water heater on main level adjacent parking stalls. Remove existing gas unit heater and water coil unit heater on main level.
|
Schedule |
| 1 |
|
4/28/2009 |
|
Educational Meeting & Site Walk |
| 2 |
|
5/12/2009 |
|
Submittals Due |
| 3 |
|
5/15/2009 |
|
UMN Identifies Potential Best Value |
| 4 |
|
5/19/2009 |
|
Pre Award Kick Off Meeting |
| 5 |
|
6/02/2009 |
|
Pre-Award meeting |
| 6 |
|
6/05/2009 |
|
Anticipated Date of Award |
|
|
Award Information |
Vendor Name: |
|
Egan Company |
Estimated Budget: |
|
$200,000 |
Awarded Cost: |
|
$11,000 |
Awarded Duration: |
|
126 days |
Scope of Work: |
|
Demo existing boilers, domestic water and piping |
For detailed award information, click here ( XLS). (This excel spreadsheet provides a summary of all the data that was collected. It is available only to pre-approved vendors). Please contact the PBSRG for the username and password.)
For a complete list of all project risks, click here ( DOC). (This document contains a list of all the risks that were identified by the vendors on this project. No solutions are identified, just a list of risks). This file is available to only pre-approved vendors. Please contact the PBSRG for the username and password. |
|
Closeout Status |
Vendor met proposed schedule: |
|
Yes |
Vendor met proposed cost: |
|
Yes |
Vendor met purposed quality/customer satisfaction: |
|
Yes |
Final customer rating of PIPS (10 max): |
|
10 |
| Final rating of contractor (10 max): |
|
10 |
|
|